User talk:Glider87

Hello!

Hello and welcome to my talk page! Talk to me, but don't abuse me! Wiki-Love etc!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

How do I view a history of when pages linking a category were added? For example with this page Category:3D_platform_games how do I get a history of when each page added the category? Glider87 (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's an easy way to check that; you'll have to check each article's page history to see when that specific article was added to the category. The category itself doesn't log when pages get added or removed. Huon (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyan Engineering

Hello Glider87,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cyan Engineering for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ārash ツ‏ 15:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Fnagaton (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Glider87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I read the sock puppet report but I don't know who has supposedly been using proxies but it's not me. I'm just an editor who shares an interest in similar subjects. Glider87 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hello, I read the SPI report and this is a WP:DUCK case of sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.